George Dubya, the titular head of the US state, recently got headlines by okaying the veto by Congress of Clinton-era ergonomic rules in the workplace. I wonder: isn't part of this reversal Clinton's fault? After all, Big Bill left this proposal to the end of his years, so that its actual enactment would be up in the air. As a neoliberal, he probably liked the idea of proposing stuff that sounds pro-worker without its actual passage.
Don't go grasping for straws, and never underestimate the effects of total disorganization. Had Big Al been elected, the Clinton-era ergonomic rules would still have been set out, and would stand.
Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Japan, (continued)
- Re: Re: Japan, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 22 Mar 2001, 18:25 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Japan, Jim Devine Thu 22 Mar 2001, 18:28 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Japan, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 22 Mar 2001, 20:57 GMT
- Japan, Charles Brown Thu 22 Mar 2001, 21:20 GMT
- Re: ergonomics, etc., Brad DeLong Thu 22 Mar 2001, 14:14 GMT
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc., Doug Henwood Thu 22 Mar 2001, 16:18 GMT
- : Re: ergonomics, etc., Ellen Frank Thu 22 Mar 2001, 17:17 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc., Brad DeLong Fri 23 Mar 2001, 17:18 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc., Lisa & Ian Murray Fri 23 Mar 2001, 17:47 GMT