Re: gross hypocracy

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gross hypocracy
From: Margaret Coleman <drmsecon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 10:20:57 -0600

I didn't read the article Michael refers to -- how will eliminating the
death tax allow more women to stay home?  maggie coleman

Michael Perelman wrote:

> Cynical as I am, I'm surprised by the recent twists of the Wall Street
> Journal editorial page.  First, after years of haranguing about the
> national debt, is no longer a problem.  They want tax cuts.  Also, on
> yesterday's editorial page ahead an article arguing that the elimination
> of the dreaded death tax will allow more women to stay home thereby
> promoting family values.
>
> -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- gross hypocracy
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Re Globaloney, competition and bolloks
Next by Date: Re: disabled crusader
Previous by thread: gross hypocracy
Next by thread: New Demand Planning & Management System
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- The deficit and the dollar, Louis Proyect Fri 23 Feb 2001, 14:32 GMT
  - Re: The deficit and the dollar, Jim Devine Fri 23 Feb 2001, 17:05 GMT
- New Demand Planning & Management System, water@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri 23 Feb 2001, 12:53 GMT
- gross hypocracy, Michael Perelman Fri 23 Feb 2001, 04:48 GMT
  - Re: gross hypocracy, Margaret Coleman Sun 25 Feb 2001, 15:18 GMT
- Canadian Parliament haggles over FTAA and "transparency", Lisa & Ian Murray Fri 23 Feb 2001, 01:45 GMT
- Jevons and the coal question, Louis Proyect Thu 22 Feb 2001, 23:32 GMT
- Laos adheres to socialist road, Charles Brown Thu 22 Feb 2001, 22:17 GMT
- Clues to Japanese economic recovery?, Louis Proyect Thu 22 Feb 2001, 21:59 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]