PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Re: Re: tax cuts



Please tell us your conclusions rather than tantalizing us with hints.

At 08:41 AM 2/22/01 -0800, you wrote:
Curious on this I just checked the DLC website. Did a search "payroll tax"
50 hits.
http://www.ndol.org/index.cfm

Michael Pugliese

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Devine <jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, February 22, 2001 8:15 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:8354] Re: tax cuts


>At 10:26 PM 2/21/01 -0600, you wrote: >>To give some idea of what a difference it would make to cut the payroll >>tax than >>income taxes, or in addition to income taxes, consider the >>following. While the >>bottom half of tax paying income earners pay around 4% of the total income >>tax, >>the same group pays just under 20% of the total payroll tax. The bottom 75% >>pay 17% of the total income tax, while the same group pays half of the payroll >>tax. Cutting payroll taxes puts moolah in the hands of lower income folks who >>need the bread, and who are more likely to spend larger portions, on normal >>goods (not luxuries). Doesn't this mean that a payroll tax cut is the >>progressive tax cut? Max? > >strangely enough, Senator Joseph Lieberman (the recently-elected Vice >President of the U.S.) agrees. (Cf. BUSINESS WEEK, February 12, 2001, p. 28.) > >Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine >

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]