To give some idea of what a difference it would make to cut the payroll tax than income taxes, or in addition to income taxes, consider the following. While the bottom half of tax paying income earners pay around 4% of the total income tax, the same group pays just under 20% of the total payroll tax. The bottom 75% pay 17% of the total income tax, while the same group pays half of the payroll tax. Cutting payroll taxes puts moolah in the hands of lower income folks who need the bread, and who are more likely to spend larger portions, on normal goods (not luxuries). Doesn't this mean that a payroll tax cut is the progressive tax cut? Max?
strangely enough, Senator Joseph Lieberman (the recently-elected Vice President of the U.S.) agrees. (Cf. BUSINESS WEEK, February 12, 2001, p. 28.)
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Barkely's antisematism article, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Barkely's antisematism article, Jim Devine Mon 26 Feb 2001, 01:32 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Barkely's antisematism article, Ken Hanly Mon 26 Feb 2001, 04:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Barkely's antisematism article, Michael Pugliese Mon 26 Feb 2001, 04:12 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Barkely's antisematism article, Ken Hanly Mon 26 Feb 2001, 18:27 GMT
- Re: tax cuts, Jim Devine Thu 22 Feb 2001, 16:15 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: tax cuts, Michael Pugliese Thu 22 Feb 2001, 16:45 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: tax cuts, Jim Devine Thu 22 Feb 2001, 16:59 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: tax cuts, Michael Pugliese Thu 22 Feb 2001, 17:29 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: tax cuts, Jim Devine Thu 22 Feb 2001, 17:43 GMT