BLS DAILY REPORT, TUESDAY, JANUARY 2, 2001 A reader of "Ask Marilyn" in Sunday's Parade Magazine asks about 'the statement that, on average, women earn only about 75% of what men earn for doing the same work." She replies, "That statement is a common misinterpretation of 1999 Bureau of Labor Statistics data. The percentage -- actually 77% -- simply compares the weekly median earnings (median means middle: equal numbers of people earn above and below that figure) of all working women ... and all working men. ... But that includes everyone from dishwashers to physicists! It has nothing whatsoever to do with "equal pay for equal work." Instead, it merely indicates that men generally occupy positions that pay more. ... " __The U.S. economy will weaken significantly in 2001, as consumer demand and business investment cool from the high-flying times that began to fizzle last fall, according to a panel of economic forecasters surveyed by the Bureau of National Affairs. Only one prognosticator predicts a recession, while most of the others predict that growth will shift downward to about 3 percent this year, although a few put the expected gain in real gross domestic product at about 4 percent. ... The economy appears to have settled into a calmer growth mode that nearly all economists in the BNA survey group believe will allow it to continue expanding without threat of higher inflation. To a greater degree than in more than a decade, however, growth prospects hinge on new fiscal policy directions as a new administration and a divided Congress forge compromises on tax cuts and spending. ... The unemployment rate is expected to rise to an average of 4.3 percent as labor demand eases. ... Control of employment costs are key to preventing recession. ... Wage inflation prospects are moderate, but benefit trend is worrisome. ... (Daily Labor Report special issue: "2001 Outlook: The Economy"). __The euphoria dominating last year turns to prudence in 2001, says The Wall Street Journal (page A2). Following some of the most spectacular and volatile years for the economy in decades -- when growth zoomed in the first half of the year -- the year 2001 economy is expected to grow at a relatively sluggish pace throughout the year. Most economists don't expect a full-blown recession this year, but nearly all of them warn that the risk of recession is substantially higher this year than it has been in many years. That is because two major forces that powered the U.S. economic boom -- strong consumer spending and business investment -- are fading due to rising interest rates and the sting of higher energy costs. The consensus forecast also calls for milder inflation, a higher unemployment rate, and lower interest rates for the next 6 months. ... The Conference Board's help-wanted index dropped 4 percentage points in November, suggesting that there will be no quick rebound in employment growth in the first half of 2001. The index declined to 75 percent of its 1987 level in November, down from 85 percent one year ago. ... (Daily Labor Report, page A-6). The Purchasing Management Association of Chicago reported that its closely watched survey of manufacturing activity in the Midwest had found that manufacturing contracted in December for a third consecutive month, as inventories and order backlogs shrunk. ... (New York Times, Dec. 30, page B2). As Japan contemplates a huge labor shortage in the very near future, the society has shown greater readiness to contemplate even large-scale immigration -- long one of the country's biggest taboos -- rather than moving quickly to provide equal opportunities for Japanese women, who are still being shunted off in large part onto dead-end jobs. ... (New York Times, Jan. 1, page C1). The average cost of a public 4-year college degree was $33,364 and a private college degree $84,080 in 1999, but it's worth it, according to a new cost-benefit analysis, says The Washington Post (page A7). The additional average lifetime income from a college degree is $1.2 million for men and $600,000 for women, according to the Mortensen Research Seminar on Public Policy Analysis of Opportunity for Post-secondary Education, based in Oskaloosa, Iowa. ... The report says, "Generally, more education leads to greater economic stability and security, more prestigious employment, better access to health care, less dependency on government assistance, longer life span, better dietary and health practices, healthier children, greater use of seat belts, more continuing education, greater Internet access, greater attendance at live performances, greater participation in leisure and artistic activities, more book purchases, better academic performance of children, higher voting rates, greater knowledge of government, greater community service, more volunteer work, greater tolerance of unconventional literature, greater community leadership, and less criminal activity and incarceration" (Washington Post, page A7). DUE OUT TOMORROW: Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment: November 2000
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Re: ONEE, ALI KADRI Fri 05 Jan 2001, 08:50 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 05 Jan 2001, 07:53 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 05 Jan 2001, 08:02 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Sun 07 Jan 2001, 22:12 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Sun 07 Jan 2001, 22:27 GMT
- Japan labor shortage: Re: BLS Daily Report, michael perelman Mon 08 Jan 2001, 01:02 GMT
- interesting job announcement, michael perelman Fri 05 Jan 2001, 04:00 GMT
- radioactive spoons again, michael perelman Thu 04 Jan 2001, 21:15 GMT
- Re: Energy deregulation, kelley Thu 04 Jan 2001, 20:05 GMT