Re: Re: Linda Chavez

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: Linda Chavez
From: "Ken Hanly" <khanly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 00:58:51 -0600

And doesnt Reagan have a union background too.....There are unions and then
there are unions....
     CHeers, Ken Hanly\

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Walker <timework@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:07 PM
>Subject: [PEN-L:6639] Re: Linda Chavez


> Michael Perelman wrote,
>
> >On her way to the right????
>
> Well, as Linda Chavez herself said, she went from Al Shanker to Ronald
> Reagan and there wasn't really that much of a difference.
> Tom Walker
> Sandwichman and Deconsultant
> Bowen Island, BC
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Linda Chavez
  - From: Jim Devine

References:
- Re: Linda Chavez
  - From: Tom Walker

Prev by Date: Thanks, Canadians
Next by Date: "The doctor gazed at me and a wild look came into his eyes."
Previous by thread: Re: Linda Chavez
Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Linda Chavez
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Linda Chavez, (continued)
  - Re: Linda Chavez, Tom Walker Tue 02 Jan 2001, 23:13 GMT
  - Re: Linda Chavez, Tom Walker Wed 03 Jan 2001, 02:22 GMT
    - Re: Re: Linda Chavez, michael Wed 03 Jan 2001, 02:35 GMT
  - Re: Linda Chavez, Tom Walker Wed 03 Jan 2001, 03:10 GMT
    - Re: Re: Linda Chavez, Ken Hanly Wed 03 Jan 2001, 07:10 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: Linda Chavez, Jim Devine Wed 03 Jan 2001, 15:56 GMT
  - Linda Chavez, neil Thu 04 Jan 2001, 04:39 GMT
  - Re: Linda Chavez, Colin Danby Sun 07 Jan 2001, 21:18 GMT
- financial prosthetics?, Tom Walker Tue 02 Jan 2001, 22:01 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]