PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

Re: Re: supply-side economics

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: supply-side economics
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 19:52:21 -0500

Tom Walker wrote:

My own view is that the National Review is,
evolutionarily speaking, trotskyist.


Was James Burnham a Trot?

Doug

References:
- Re: supply-side economics
  - From: Tom Walker

Prev by Date: Re: RE: Re: RE: Supply-side economics
Next by Date: The fractal geometry of labor saving technical change
Previous by thread: Re: supply-side economics
Next by thread: Supply-side economics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- A new direction??, Charles Brown Wed 20 Dec 2000, 14:51 GMT
  - RE: A new direction??, Lisa & Ian Murray Wed 20 Dec 2000, 16:32 GMT
- Re: RE: Supply-side economics, Rob Schaap Wed 20 Dec 2000, 13:27 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: supply-side economics, Tom Walker Thu 21 Dec 2000, 07:09 GMT
    - Re: Re: supply-side economics, Doug Henwood Fri 22 Dec 2000, 00:57 GMT
  - Supply-side economics, Charles Brown Thu 21 Dec 2000, 15:25 GMT
  - Re: Re: Re: supply-side economics, Justin Schwartz Fri 22 Dec 2000, 01:42 GMT
- Miyabe on Japanese consumer debt (courtesy of Mat), Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 20 Dec 2000, 07:12 GMT
- Bill Tabb is gone: A new direction??, Michael Perelman Wed 20 Dec 2000, 05:09 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]