RE: Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber)

To: "'pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber)
From: Mikalac Norman S NSSC <MikalacNS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:20:35 -0500

It fascinates me that contingency leaves both you & Charles, Lou &
Ricardo, etc., unhappy & unsatisfied, for all the differences in
opinions on many other subjects.

Yoshie

--------------------------------------

maybe not so surprising because if history follows a random path
(contingency), then dialectic materialism theory of history doesn't make any
sense and that disturbs some people.

norm

Prev by Date: Time for agile leftists to shift and support Gore.
Next by Date: Re: Gould and contingency
Previous by thread: Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber)
Next by thread: Re: Back in the US... SR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber), (continued)
  - Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber), Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 07 Dec 2000, 04:32 GMT
  - RE: Re: Max Weber's Genteel Racism (was Re: weber), Mikalac Norman S NSSC Thu 07 Dec 2000, 17:30 GMT
- Cyborg variations, Tom Walker Wed 06 Dec 2000, 03:28 GMT
  - RE: Cyborg variations, Lisa & Ian Murray Wed 06 Dec 2000, 07:08 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Cyborg variations, Tom Walker Wed 06 Dec 2000, 19:04 GMT
  - Re: Cyborg variations, Charles Brown Thu 07 Dec 2000, 01:27 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]