Re: Re: Re: Re: Weber and rationality

[kelley <kwalker2@xxxxxxx>]

> Tend to agree with you on Weber, Kelley, but then I'm not sure Ricardo
> disagrees.  And Ricardo's name is, I believe, Ricardo.  But then, I believe
> yours is Kelley.  Typos both?
>
> Yours still not reading that information services report,
> Rob.

thanks.  no, i don't think ricardo disagrees.  never thought he disagreed
on weber.  i replied, buttressing his argument.  he interpreted me as
misusing the concept of rationality.  i corrected him.  ricardo, you think
i'm being rude, yes?

as for the name, many apologies!  sincerely, ricardo, i make a lot of
typos.  i proof read but sometimes cannot see them without printing to hard
copy and even then cannot see them without a lot of time passing between
when i compose and when i proofread.  i don't know why this happens.  i do
things like type "thinks" for "things" or "objectivity" when i want to type
"objects and".   i am probably dyslexic.

worse, i'm aghast because i was reading when there was a small war over
this issue, last fall i think!   again, many apologies.

i even have a joke for when i've been especially awful with the typhoes!
:)  maybe some humor will lighten things up.  rob will appreciate anyway!

________________________
action items for week 12.04.00

1.  hock ex's led zep and buddy rich colliction
2.  use mony for apt with ornithologist for and i exam.
3.  order glasses
3.  install eudora's spill cheeker
4.  once instilled, atually remeber to use it
5.  try proof redding fur a change
6   by knew cat o nine
7.  lash mysef twenty-five tims