PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: Re: co-ops
What I recall was a bill in Congress .
CB
>>> MikalacNS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 12/05/00 01:00PM >>>
don't understand why this is a Constitutional crisis worthy of the High-9.
something in the Constitution that prevents co-ops?
maybe i need a legal lesson in "legal forms of business enterprise".
norm
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Devine [mailto:jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:51 PM
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [PEN-L:5537] Re: Re: co-ops
At 01:20 PM 12/4/00 -0800, you wrote:
>A case hit the Supreme Court a couple years ago in which the banks tried to
>curtail the credit unions.
didn't they succeed? this is different though, since they were trying to
squish their competitors rather than objecting to an organizational form of
the potential borrowers.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: co-ops, (continued)
- Re: co-ops,
Justin Schwartz Tue 05 Dec 2000, 19:32 GMT
- co-ops,
Mikalac Norman S NSSC Tue 05 Dec 2000, 19:35 GMT
- Re: co-ops,
Justin Schwartz Tue 05 Dec 2000, 19:38 GMT
- Re: co-ops,
Justin Schwartz Tue 05 Dec 2000, 19:50 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: co-ops,
Charles Brown Wed 06 Dec 2000, 20:54 GMT
- goodbye for now, once again,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Mon 04 Dec 2000, 19:07 GMT
- marxism-socialsim concepts and people,
Mikalac Norman S NSSC Mon 04 Dec 2000, 18:16 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]