Re: RE: Re: Pleasure

To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Pleasure
From: "Ken Hanly" <khanly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:33:28 -0600

Uh! I hadn't realised that things were called sins because they were not
cheap. I thought it was because they were pleasurable and God forbids
pleasure :)

Cheers, Ken Hanly



> but "sin" ain't cheap, that's why they call it "sin". ,
>

References:
- RE: Re: Pleasure
  - From: Lisa & Ian Murray

Prev by Date: Henwood's view of free choice
Next by Date: New drug policy in Vancouver BC
Previous by thread: RE: Re: Pleasure
Next by thread: Pleasure, Production, & Patriotism
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- US involvement in Latin America, Ken Hanly Wed 22 Nov 2000, 00:57 GMT
- Pleasure, Colin Danby Wed 22 Nov 2000, 00:53 GMT
  - Re: Pleasure, Doug Henwood Wed 22 Nov 2000, 01:21 GMT
    - RE: Re: Pleasure, Lisa & Ian Murray Wed 22 Nov 2000, 02:21 GMT
      
      Re: RE: Re: Pleasure, Ken Hanly Wed 22 Nov 2000, 04:38 GMT
  - Pleasure, Production, & Patriotism, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 22 Nov 2000, 02:25 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Re: RE: Re: Pleasure, Justin Schwartz Wed 22 Nov 2000, 06:10 GMT
  - Re: Re: RE: Re: Pleasure, Justin Schwartz Wed 22 Nov 2000, 06:12 GMT
    - Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Pleasure, Ken Hanly Wed 22 Nov 2000, 06:33 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]