PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Henwood's view of free choice
I was going to drop out of this discussion, and someone already said
something like what follows, but here goes.
Henwood wants people to be free to choose their behavior, ingestion,
consumption. Splendid. But this libertatian view is posited as if we
all had that freedom and only lefties of one stripe or another want to
impose behavior on others.
The world we live in doesn't give us choices of behavior. Doug's
position simply is neo-classical economics about consumer behavior --
independent selection of what to buy and how to live. We don't have
that independence, we are totally entwined, one with another.
We impose consumption on each other, and are in turn imposed upon.
Samuelson et. al. are full of shit.
Gene Coyle
- Thread context:
- Rodchenko, Stepanova, & Cigarettes (was Re: How far do we go?...), (continued)
- More Clinton-Gore Progress,
Michael Perelman Wed 22 Nov 2000, 05:38 GMT
- Re: How far do we go?,
martin schiller Wed 22 Nov 2000, 05:25 GMT
- New drug policy in Vancouver BC,
Ken Hanly Wed 22 Nov 2000, 04:41 GMT
- Henwood's view of free choice,
Eugene Coyle Wed 22 Nov 2000, 04:12 GMT
- US Plays Dirty As Planet Chokes,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 22 Nov 2000, 03:51 GMT
- Fwd: Call for Papers: Socialism & Democracy,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 22 Nov 2000, 03:27 GMT
- China: ADB forecasts slide in growth toward 7.5pc,
Stephen E Philion Wed 22 Nov 2000, 01:09 GMT
- US involvement in Latin America,
Ken Hanly Wed 22 Nov 2000, 00:57 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]