Michael Perelman wrote:
True enough, but don't the adverse consequences of tobacco hit the working-class harder? So, discouraging smoking by taxes might have positive consequences over the long run.
Shouldn't people decide for themselves whether to smoke? Do you think you should prescribe their diet too?
Doug
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, (continued)
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Mon 20 Nov 2000, 23:19 GMT
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 05:22 GMT
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Sun 19 Nov 2000, 21:14 GMT
- Vodka & Perestroika (was Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary), Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 22:32 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Doug Henwood Tue 21 Nov 2000, 18:34 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Lisa & Ian Murray Tue 21 Nov 2000, 18:53 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Tue 21 Nov 2000, 18:56 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Lisa & Ian Murray Tue 21 Nov 2000, 20:29 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Tue 21 Nov 2000, 21:33 GMT