PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: nationalism/Blaut
Earlier, I was concerned about Neil's sectarian posts, but the sentiment
on the list overruled me. Attacking Jim so soon after his death was
certainly in bad taste, showing a great deal of insensitivity. Louis's
response to Neil, referring to him as sectarian vermin was certainly over
the top. Under ordinary circumstances, I would probably ask him to leave
the list for a while, but given his closeness to Jim, I think we can cut
him some slack, given the circumstances.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 09:45:27PM -0500, neil wrote:
> This was quite a reply to the critique of nat-lib/Blaut from Louis P!
> Ah, What splendid profundity shown for his political trend!
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>
> From: Louis Proyect, INTERNET:lnp3@xxxxxxxxx
> TO: (unknown), 74742,1651
> DATE: 11/20/00 4:58 PM
>
> RE: Re: [PEN-L:4679] nationalism/Blaut
>
> Sender: lnp3@xxxxxxxxx
> Received: from menyapa.cc.columbia.edu (menyapa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.38])
> by spdmgaac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.9) with ESMTP id TAA26381
> for <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:58:51 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from default (dialup-ccts6-84.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.4.182])
> by menyapa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA21365
> for <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:58:50 -0500 (EST)
> Message-Id: <200011210058.TAA21365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-Sender: lnp3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:56:45 -0500
> To: 74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L:4679] nationalism/Blaut
> In-Reply-To: <200011201931_MC2-BB96-1B9D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> "neil" wrote:
> >In e-mail discussions with the late Jim Blaut in 1996-8 , he never counld
> >explain why the 'theory'
> >of so-called national liberation of colonies since WW1 with the cross
> >class blocs of forces always
> >ended up with the national bourgeois on top and the toiling masses urban
> >and rural, politically
> >and economically hogtied and repressed, many times in blood , and under
> >the gun from their new nationally liberated regimes and their patrons..
>
> You are sectarian vermin.
>
> Louis Proyect
> Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Questions from Russia, (continued)
- Voters vote NO on war on drugs,
Ken Hanly Tue 21 Nov 2000, 01:51 GMT
- nationalism/Blaut,
neil Tue 21 Nov 2000, 00:36 GMT
- Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment,
Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 20 Nov 2000, 22:23 GMT
- Declaration of European Economists,
Frank Schroeder Mon 20 Nov 2000, 22:20 GMT
- how Green is my Valley,
Jim Devine Mon 20 Nov 2000, 21:04 GMT
- Foreigners' Views of U.S.,
Max Sawicky Mon 20 Nov 2000, 19:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]