Ken says:
Be serious. THe idiotic policy implication does not follow at all. Smoking decreases the quality and length of life for the smoker and others. The point of the argument is to refute the claim that there should be a charge against tobacco companies and users because smokers cost the medical system more. In Canada this specious and incorrect claim is perhaps more effective since we have a universal medicare system.
You mean that Canadians tend to fall for the idea that since the state provides for health care, the state is entitled to punish unhealthy choices, behaviors, activities, etc.?
Yoshie
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Sun 19 Nov 2000, 03:17 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Max Sawicky Mon 20 Nov 2000, 00:44 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Mon 20 Nov 2000, 00:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Mon 20 Nov 2000, 01:57 GMT
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 20 Nov 2000, 22:30 GMT
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Mon 20 Nov 2000, 23:19 GMT
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 05:22 GMT
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Sun 19 Nov 2000, 21:14 GMT
- Vodka & Perestroika (was Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary), Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 22:32 GMT