> . . . I tend to be pretty skeptical of gun control as a solution to crime in any > case, since economic factors are far more important. And it's a little toolate to get all the guns off the streets in any case. So if progressive> Dems did want to play "Survivor" among the various Democratic voting groups, > I would definately vote Handgun Control Inc. off the progressive island and > try to get more NRA union folks back. -- Nathan Newman
christ, we actually agree on something.
I would throw off the tobacco taxers too. But don't get me started. I might reveal my reactionary side.
mbs
Hey, sin taxes hit the working class harder than the rich. So why not chuck tobacco taxers out of the window, too?
Yoshie
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Mon 20 Nov 2000, 00:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Mon 20 Nov 2000, 01:57 GMT
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 20 Nov 2000, 22:30 GMT
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Ken Hanly Mon 20 Nov 2000, 23:19 GMT
- Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 05:22 GMT
- Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Michael Perelman Sun 19 Nov 2000, 21:14 GMT
- Vodka & Perestroika (was Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary), Yoshie Furuhashi Sun 19 Nov 2000, 22:32 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Doug Henwood Tue 21 Nov 2000, 18:34 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: yet another US electile disfunction commentary, Lisa & Ian Murray Tue 21 Nov 2000, 18:53 GMT