PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Oil & Socialism
To say that capitalism is based on fossil
fuels would be to argue that there was no
capitalism prior to the coal-based industrial
revolution in the 1700s in Great Britain. That
can be argued, but most on this list would
probably not agree.
Barkley Rosser
-----Original Message-----
From: martin schiller <martin_schiller@xxxxxxx>
To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, November 16, 2000 7:58 PM
>Subject: [PEN-L:4516] Re: Oil & Socialism
>Jim Devine said on 11/16/00 3:31 P
>
>>I guess I don't accept the premise that fossil fuels define capitalism. Do
>>you? does anyone?
>
>That's what I thought that this thread was based on.
>
>
- Thread context:
- Re: Oil & Socialism, (continued)
- Re: Oil & Socialism,
Lisa & Ian Murray Fri 17 Nov 2000, 04:44 GMT
- Oil & Socialism,
Mikalac Norman S NSSC Fri 17 Nov 2000, 15:53 GMT
- Re: Re: Oil & Socialism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 17 Nov 2000, 18:56 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Oil & Socialism,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 17 Nov 2000, 19:07 GMT
- Re: Oil & Socialism,
martin schiller Fri 17 Nov 2000, 19:41 GMT
- Oil & Socialism,
Charles Brown Fri 17 Nov 2000, 21:06 GMT
- Aral Sea Dessication,
Ken Hanly Thu 16 Nov 2000, 03:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]