Jim Devine said on 11/16/00 12:51 P
>To my mind, the key issue with fossil fuels is not the absolute shortage >that Mark talks about but instead the environmental impact. So for that >issue, the previous paragraph applies.
The oil has to be used up first in order to maintain control over energy. Oil and coal are ubiquitous and the processing technology is basic mechanical and accessable on almost any scale. Once fossil fuels are gone the only sources of energy are highly technical and easily controllable. When you control the technology you control the energy and you can hire the next Bush to represent you to his generation.
But by definition you've found the tool to dissolve capitalism by removing their fossil fuel. Become conservative!
I don't understand. Please explain.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine "Is it peace or is it Prozac?" -- Cheryl Wheeler.
- Re: RE: Re: Oil & Socialism, (continued)
- Re: RE: Re: Oil & Socialism, Michael Perelman Thu 16 Nov 2000, 20:03 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Oil & Socialism, Lisa & Ian Murray Thu 16 Nov 2000, 21:58 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oil & Socialism, Ken Hanly Thu 16 Nov 2000, 22:47 GMT
- Re: Oil & Socialism, martin schiller Thu 16 Nov 2000, 22:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Oil & Socialism, Jim Devine Thu 16 Nov 2000, 22:38 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Oil & Socialism, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 16 Nov 2000, 22:51 GMT
- Re: Oil & Socialism, martin schiller Thu 16 Nov 2000, 23:27 GMT
- Re: Re: Oil & Socialism, Jim Devine Thu 16 Nov 2000, 23:39 GMT
- Re: Oil & Socialism, martin schiller Fri 17 Nov 2000, 00:57 GMT