Re: Re: Debating slavery

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: Debating slavery
From: Jim Devine <jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:23:30 -0700

At 12:07 PM 10/20/00 -0400, you wrote:

The other tendency represented by Engerman and Fogel is to characterize the
slavocracy as capitalist, but using neoclassical economics rather than
Marxism.


If I remember correctly, Fogel was an old Leftist (CP?), while Engerman was
a new Leftist, once seen as a dangerous militant.

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

References:
- Re: Debating slavery
  - From: Louis Proyect

Prev by Date: increasing inequality in LA
Next by Date: Congress Mandates It Be Misinformed
Previous by thread: Re: Debating slavery
Next by thread: increasing inequality in LA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- increasing inequality in LA, Jim Devine Fri 20 Oct 2000, 16:34 GMT
  - Another book request, Peter Dorman Fri 20 Oct 2000, 20:52 GMT
    - RE: Another book request, Max Sawicky Fri 20 Oct 2000, 21:04 GMT
- Re: Debating slavery, Louis Proyect Fri 20 Oct 2000, 16:20 GMT
  - Re: Re: Debating slavery, Jim Devine Fri 20 Oct 2000, 16:38 GMT
- lawyers, Jim Devine Fri 20 Oct 2000, 16:05 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: lawyers, Justin Schwartz Fri 20 Oct 2000, 16:44 GMT
- Catastrophists weigh in, Louis Proyect Fri 20 Oct 2000, 15:22 GMT
- 30,000 troops protect international capitalism, Chris Burford Fri 20 Oct 2000, 06:54 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]