BTW, Davidson does make formal models, now and then, so he shouldn't be ruled out of court by King Krugman. (See his model of the finance demand for money in MONEY IN THE REAL WORLD, for example.)
Except that Paul Krugman said *nothing* at all about Paul Davidson, pro or con.
What was said was that there was something sinister about Paul Davidson, noted expert on Keynes, not appearing in the _Journal of Economic Perspectives_ in 1993.
Brad DeLong
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, (continued)
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Mon 09 Oct 2000, 22:38 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Tue 10 Oct 2000, 14:59 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:55 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Tue 10 Oct 2000, 21:17 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Brad DeLong Tue 10 Oct 2000, 21:52 GMT
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Tue 10 Oct 2000, 22:18 GMT
- Extravagant Evil and the I.M.F., Louis Proyect Sun 08 Oct 2000, 18:54 GMT
- Yugoslavia "is still a socialist country", Louis Proyect Sun 08 Oct 2000, 18:23 GMT
- Re: Marx (and Engels) article or essay request [on Irish], charlie Sun 08 Oct 2000, 18:22 GMT