Michael Perelman wrote:
Yes. Davidson's early book on Keyenesian economics was the first to emphasize Keynes's radical uncertainty as opposed to hydraulic Keynesianism.
But that's in the GT, and expressed better. My sense is that Davidson gets so carried away with nonergodicity that you wonder how capitalism functions at all.
Doug
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, (continued)
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Perelman Mon 09 Oct 2000, 21:06 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Brad DeLong Tue 10 Oct 2000, 00:33 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Doug Henwood Tue 10 Oct 2000, 14:52 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Perelman Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:10 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Doug Henwood Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:39 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Mon 09 Oct 2000, 22:38 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Tue 10 Oct 2000, 14:59 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:55 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Tue 10 Oct 2000, 21:17 GMT