Brad DeLong wrote:
I believe Paul Davidson, who regardless of your theoretical leanings must be considered a foremost authority on Keynes, was excluded from the JEP's symposium on Keynesian Economics.
Cheap shots.
*None* of the people writing in the symposium--neither Tobin, Mankiw, Romer, Greenwald, Stiglitz, nor King--were authorities of any sort, foremost or not, on John Maynard Keynes. Moreover, Davidson had been in the journal two years before. Unless we think that someone is *the* very best person to write on a topic, and that that topic *has* to be in the symposium, we try not to have the same stable of authors over and over again. I presume that one of Stiglitz's aim in putting together the symposium was to avoid yet another round of exegesis of the _General Theory_.
Could someone enlighten me - has Davidson ever written or said anything of compelling interest?
Doug
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, (continued)
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Mon 09 Oct 2000, 18:08 GMT
- RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Mon 09 Oct 2000, 18:48 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Perelman Mon 09 Oct 2000, 21:06 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Brad DeLong Tue 10 Oct 2000, 00:33 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Doug Henwood Tue 10 Oct 2000, 14:52 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Perelman Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:10 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Doug Henwood Tue 10 Oct 2000, 15:39 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Mon 09 Oct 2000, 22:38 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Tue 10 Oct 2000, 14:59 GMT