Mat wrote:Klassic because, unlike most mainstreamers, he has read stuff written more than five years old, or because he overlooks Marx? And shouldn't it be "continuous"?
Peter quotes Krugman:"...the young Schumpeter, writing before World War I, was the first major economist to recognize that continual technological change is part of what capitalism is all about."
Mat doesn't understand that for PK, "major" means "respectable, while attaining tenure at a Big Name school."
No. For Paul Krugman "major economist" means someone who built a useful model--like Ricardo. Marx's attempts at economic model building as we see it were not successful--hence Samuelson's judgment of Marx as a minor post-Ricardian.
For Paul Krugman, Marx is a sociologist...
Brad DeLong -- Professor J. Bradford DeLong Department of Economics, #3880 University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-3880 (510) 643-4027; (925) 283-2709 voice (510) 642-6615; (925) 283-3897 fax http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, (continued)
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Mon 09 Oct 2000, 00:29 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Yates Mon 09 Oct 2000, 00:50 GMT
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Mon 09 Oct 2000, 15:58 GMT
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, Michael Perelman Mon 09 Oct 2000, 17:28 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Brad De Long Mon 09 Oct 2000, 03:21 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Sun 08 Oct 2000, 22:05 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Jim Devine Mon 09 Oct 2000, 04:55 GMT
- RE: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, Forstater, Mathew Sun 08 Oct 2000, 22:16 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic, enilsson Mon 09 Oct 2000, 05:08 GMT