PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic
I should have noted that the text of the "boxes" on each of the famed economists
accompanying the article were by Romer, not the author of the article.
I wrote:
A few years ago, Paul Romer was on the cover of, I think it was "Forbes, Jr.",
apparently a special Forbes Mag for college kids. The picture was accompanied by
something like "Future Nobel Prize?" As part of the article, there were a few
paragraphs each on Keynes, Schumpeter, Marshall, and I think either Marx or
Smith. It was all fairly infuriating, first because of the omissions, then the
tone, and also the content.
First prize I think still goes to Stiglitz and Shapiro's "Equilibrium
Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device" in the American Economic Review
where the term "reserve army" was used, with no mention of Marx in the article
or bibliography.
Mat
- Thread context:
- Re: A Krugman Klassic, (continued)
- RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic,
Forstater, Mathew Sun 08 Oct 2000, 22:05 GMT
- RE: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic,
Forstater, Mathew Sun 08 Oct 2000, 22:16 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic,
enilsson Mon 09 Oct 2000, 05:08 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic,
JKSCHW Mon 09 Oct 2000, 14:03 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]