Re: Re: debate

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: debate
From: Jim Devine <jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:06:27 -0700

At 08:36 AM 10/4/00 -0700, you wrote:

Can you imagine how much better the debate would have been with someone like
Nader who could cut through such slogans?


according to SLATE: >The [Washington Post] early edition reports that Ralph
Nader had a ticket to the debate but doesn't say what happened. The NY
[Times] and LA [Times] do: He showed up at the door and was refused
admittance.<

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: debate
  - From: Louis Proyect

References:
- debate
  - From: Jim Devine
- Re: debate
  - From: Michael Perelman

Prev by Date: Book Announcement: Taming Global Financial Flows
Next by Date: RE: debate
Previous by thread: Re: debate
Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Book Announcement: Taming Global Financial Flows, Kavaljit Singh Wed 04 Oct 2000, 16:09 GMT
- debate, Jim Devine Wed 04 Oct 2000, 14:47 GMT
  - Re: debate, Jim Devine Wed 04 Oct 2000, 15:17 GMT
  - Re: debate, Michael Perelman Wed 04 Oct 2000, 15:57 GMT
    - Re: Re: debate, Jim Devine Wed 04 Oct 2000, 16:12 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: debate, Louis Proyect Wed 04 Oct 2000, 20:05 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: Re: debate, Eugene Coyle Wed 04 Oct 2000, 22:58 GMT
  - RE: debate, Max Sawicky Wed 04 Oct 2000, 16:22 GMT
    - Re: RE: debate, Joel Blau Wed 04 Oct 2000, 20:18 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]