>Of course, the fact that it _looks as if_ the Fed has been steeringthe economy toward low unemployment and low inflation during the last 8 years or so is mostly a matter of luck: if the Fed had followed its vision of the Phillips Curve, we'd still have 6 percent unemployment in the US.
But it didn't. Greenspan overruled Meyer and company and said that they should let the unemployment rate drift down and see what happened... Brad DeLong
Right. But Meyer's our guy and Greenspan is their guy. I'm so confused.
mbs
Blame me. It's my fault.
I thought it would be good if the Board of Governors had a solid Democrat on it who could go toe-to-toe with the model builders on the staff, and win. The higher-ups at Treasury bought the argument...
I had *no* *idea* that he was going to believe in his own models strongly enough to be world-class super inflation hawk...
Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, (continued)
- Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Jim Devine Tue 03 Oct 2000, 20:26 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Brad De Long Tue 03 Oct 2000, 22:46 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Jim Devine Wed 04 Oct 2000, 00:19 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Max Sawicky Wed 04 Oct 2000, 03:31 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Brad De Long Wed 04 Oct 2000, 05:04 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Max Sawicky Thu 05 Oct 2000, 00:41 GMT
- Re: saving and aggregate demand, Doug Henwood Tue 03 Oct 2000, 16:13 GMT
- Re: saving and aggregate demand, Charles Brown Tue 03 Oct 2000, 16:02 GMT
- RE: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Forstater, Mathew Tue 03 Oct 2000, 17:26 GMT