Of course, the fact that it _looks as if_ the Fed has been steering the economy toward low unemployment and low inflation during the last 8 years or so is mostly a matter of luck: if the Fed had followed its vision of the Phillips Curve, we'd still have 6 percent unemployment in the US.
But it didn't. Greenspan overruled Meyer and company and said that they should let the unemployment rate drift down and see what happened...
that's what's called luck. They also did stuff like lowering rates in 1998 to try to avoid a spread of the East Asian meltdown. They were just lucky that this didn't cause the inflation they fear. like the plague itself. The Krugmanite image of the all-knowing, all-powerful Fed is hype. It's an excuse to shift power to irresponsible bureaucrats who are beholden to the financially powerful. One of the reasons why Greenspan has tolerated "labor shortages," etc. is that he's afraid of spooking the stock market and hurting his allies...
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Jim Devine Thu 05 Oct 2000, 22:36 GMT
- What's the matter with investment?, Peter Dorman Thu 05 Oct 2000, 22:48 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Jim Devine Tue 03 Oct 2000, 20:26 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Brad De Long Tue 03 Oct 2000, 22:46 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Jim Devine Wed 04 Oct 2000, 00:19 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Max Sawicky Wed 04 Oct 2000, 03:31 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Brad De Long Wed 04 Oct 2000, 05:04 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: saving and aggregate demand, Max Sawicky Thu 05 Oct 2000, 00:41 GMT
- Re: saving and aggregate demand, Doug Henwood Tue 03 Oct 2000, 16:13 GMT