Jim Devine suggested a passage on page 128 (vintage) 38 (progress). The explicit distinction is on page 152/66. Marx is clear in stating that value and its magnitude DO NOT originate in exchange value, they are "expressed" in exchange value.
Tom, could you give the full quote?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- RE: RE: The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re: Charlie Andrew's book), (continued)
- RE: RE: The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re: Charlie Andrew's book), Lisa & Ian Murray Thu 21 Sep 2000, 16:14 GMT
- The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re:Charlie Andrew's book), Charles Brown Thu 21 Sep 2000, 15:48 GMT
- Value: paragraphs quoted from Capital, Timework Web Thu 21 Sep 2000, 15:44 GMT
- The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re: Charlie Andrew's book), Timework Web Thu 21 Sep 2000, 14:55 GMT
- Re: The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re: Charlie Andrew's book), Jim Devine Thu 21 Sep 2000, 15:15 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: The simple/elementary form of value considered as a whole (was Re: Charlie Andrew's book), Timework Web Thu 21 Sep 2000, 18:03 GMT
- Pacifica and the Internet, Louis Proyect Thu 21 Sep 2000, 14:52 GMT
- Consumerism, Louis Proyect Thu 21 Sep 2000, 13:30 GMT
- Malaysian exchange controls, Bill Rosenberg Thu 21 Sep 2000, 12:46 GMT