Peter Dorman wrote:
I don't understand this comment. Demanding higher wages is exactly what the anti-sweatshop groups are doing.
Yes. For an overview of what the student branch of the movement is up to, see <http://www.thenation.com/issue/000515/0515featherstone.shtml>. They're demanding that garment makers "comply with a strict code of conduct--guaranteeing workers a living wage and the right to organize unions--and mandate full public disclosure of wages, factory locations and working conditions."
Doug
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thanks Brad, was The legacy of Juan, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thanks Brad, was The legacy of Juan, michael Fri 15 Sep 2000, 16:47 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thanks Brad, was The legacy of Juan Perón, Jim Devine Fri 15 Sep 2000, 18:50 GMT
- Re: in praise of sweatshops, Brad De Long Fri 15 Sep 2000, 16:33 GMT
- Re: Re: in praise of sweatshops, Peter Dorman Fri 15 Sep 2000, 18:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: in praise of sweatshops, Doug Henwood Fri 15 Sep 2000, 20:45 GMT
- Lights out for those who don't pay the privatizers., Ken Hanly Fri 15 Sep 2000, 16:33 GMT
- Re: Lights out for those who don't pay the privatizers., Eugene Coyle Fri 15 Sep 2000, 18:52 GMT
- Scab tires + corporate profits = highway fatalities, Louis Proyect Fri 15 Sep 2000, 15:38 GMT
- Progress in India?, Michael Perelman Fri 15 Sep 2000, 15:34 GMT