...The movement of the rate of profit over time is due to two major effects: changes in the share of profits in value added and movements in the organic composition. The latter, in turn, is due to movements in sectoral organic composition levels and shifts in the employment shares among industries. On the basis of equations (8) and (16), we can separate out the effects of shifts in employment composition on the movement of the overall rate of profit. Results are shown in Panels C and D for the two profit rate measures. The results show rather persuasively that structural shifts were an important offset to rising organic composition on the industry level.
I've thought for a long time that Marx's theory of the falling rate of profit is primarily a microeconomic theory (though he stated it for a representative capital), which is only sometimes expressed in macroeconomic averages.
Any thoughts?
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- [fla-left] OCT 7 ACTIONS UPDATE (fwd), Michael Hoover Thu 14 Sep 2000, 22:14 GMT
- Farreaching Demands, Charles Brown Thu 14 Sep 2000, 20:18 GMT
- [fla-left] [labor/gender issues/corporate dominance] Women & The Wal-Mart Trap (fwd), Michael Hoover Thu 14 Sep 2000, 17:10 GMT
- Re: [fla-left] [labor/gender issues/corporate dominance] Women & The Wal-Mart Trap (fwd), Yoshie Furuhashi Thu 14 Sep 2000, 20:57 GMT
- Re: Re: [fla-left] [labor/gender issues/corporate dominance] Women & The Wal-Mart Trap (fwd), Jim Devine Thu 14 Sep 2000, 21:37 GMT
- Jim D.'s Micro Marx, michael Thu 14 Sep 2000, 21:51 GMT
- Query on teminology, was Re: . . .labor/gender issues/corporate..., Carrol Cox Thu 14 Sep 2000, 22:46 GMT
- Re: Query on teminology, was Re: . . .labor/gender issues/corporate..., Jim Devine Fri 15 Sep 2000, 01:06 GMT
- Re: Query on teminology, was Re: . ..labor/gender issues/corporate..., Michael Perelman Fri 15 Sep 2000, 02:11 GMT