Ken Hanley wrote:
Well this might be nice if nations intervened in other countries when bad things are done and were able to stop the bad things happenings.
When socialist nations did intervene, imperialist nations did not appreciate such interventions at all. Many intellectuals -- including many leftists -- in the West condemned the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, though the Soviets were backing the side of modernizers -- whatever faults you may find in them -- against the forces of feudal reaction supported by the CIA. It is not just military interventions by socialist nations that courted the wrath of imperialists. The presence of Cuban engineers & construction workers in Grenada was used as an excuse for the U.S. invasion of Grenada. The list is endless.
Yoshie
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, michael Wed 13 Sep 2000, 05:07 GMT
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Ken Hanly Wed 13 Sep 2000, 04:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Brad De Long Wed 13 Sep 2000, 04:55 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Ken Hanly Wed 13 Sep 2000, 17:25 GMT
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:27 GMT
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Jim Devine Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:43 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Brad De Long Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:36 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Doug Henwood Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:49 GMT
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 13 Sep 2000, 21:22 GMT