You do not explain why it is "nutso" to consider that it is no business of the rest of us what dictators do to their own people. But isn't it common among certain types of pragmatist and "realists" to claim that foreign policy ought to be based upon advancing national interest? On this view, hardly nutso, what dictators do to their own people would be a nation's business only if it impacted significantly on national interests...
No man is an island, entire of itself; Every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, As well as if a promontory were, As well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind; And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; i It tolls for thee....
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, (continued)
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Michael Perelman Wed 13 Sep 2000, 02:41 GMT
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Brad De Long Wed 13 Sep 2000, 04:55 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, michael Wed 13 Sep 2000, 05:07 GMT
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Ken Hanly Wed 13 Sep 2000, 04:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Brad De Long Wed 13 Sep 2000, 04:55 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Ken Hanly Wed 13 Sep 2000, 17:25 GMT
- Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:27 GMT
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Jim Devine Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:43 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism, Brad De Long Wed 13 Sep 2000, 20:36 GMT