PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Hume, Marx, & Rousseau
In a message dated 9/10/00 7:20:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
furuhashi.1@xxxxxxx writes:
<< Hume was anti-egalitarian
Yes
> and would be at home in the
Mises-Hayek-Nozickian world, I believe. >>
No. He's an old-timey Burkean conservative, not a market fanatic. He'd be a
"wet" Tory or a noblesse-oblige sort of Republican of the Rockerfeller sort
in our lexicon.
--jks
- Thread context:
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Australian unions back protest, (continued)
- Causality in Hume was re Hume and Pomo etc.,
Ken Hanly Mon 11 Sep 2000, 00:50 GMT
- Re: Hume, Marx, & Rousseau,
Colin Danby Mon 11 Sep 2000, 00:24 GMT
- Re: Hume,
Colin Danby Sun 10 Sep 2000, 22:24 GMT
- 3. [Fwd: Re: Problems of Relativism of Non-Postmodern Varieties],
Carrol Cox Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:11 GMT
- 2. [Fwd: Re: Problems of Relativism of Non-Postmodern Varieties],
Carrol Cox Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]