PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume & the Postmodern Grin without a...
- To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume & the Postmodern Grin without a...
- From: Ted Winslow <winslow@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 16:06:30 -0400
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Justin wrote:
> In a message dated 9/10/00 11:33:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> winslow@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << So the claim that "we always will" - i.e.
> that "in other instances" the repetition, the expectation and the belief
> will be conjoined - cannot be justified >>
>
> Of coutrse it can't. If it could, then there would be an answer to the
> problem of induction. So what's your point? --jks
The point is in the sentence following the one you quote.
Ted
--
Ted Winslow E-MAIL: WINSLOW@xxxxxxxx
Division of Social Science VOICE: (416) 736-5054
York University FAX: (416) 736-5615
4700 Keele St.
Toronto, Ontario
CANADA M3J 1P3
- Thread context:
- Re: Hume & the Postmodern Grin without a..., (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]