Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume & the Postmodern Grin without a...

["Ken Hanly" <khanly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well I was joking. But seriously would anyone hear Hume? There is constant
conjunction everywhere all the time. The ringing would be incessant and
overpowering. Wouldn't Hume seek medical attention for the constant ringing
in his ears?
     Cheers, Ken Hanly

----- Original Message -----
From: <JKSCHW@xxxxxxx>
To: <pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:46 PM
>Subject: [PEN-L:1621] Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume & the Postmodern Grin without
a...


> Hume would say, more constant conjunction is what you have--here, the CC
of
> the bell with the CC of the two other things. --jks
>
> In a message dated 9/10/00 12:13:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> khanly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << I give up. What would Hume say? The bell is warning you that constant
>  conjunction is bad for your constitution?
>      Cheers, Ken Hanly
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: <JKSCHW@xxxxxxx>
>  >
>  > > turn up in the future? Like what? Suppose a bell went off whenever
you
>  had
>  > constant conjunction, starting today. Would that help? You know what
Hume
>  > would say.
>  >
>  >
>   >>
>