There are loads of anomalies in the productivity stats. Nondurable manufacturing productivity is flat; it's all concentrated in durables, and within durables, in high-tech production. Service productivity has picked up a bit, but not that profoundly. Looking at the aggregate number is very misleading.
however, if the author cited in the New York TIMES was right that employment growth has slowed relative to real output growth, that's evidence in favor of faster labor productivity growth. (Intersectoral differences are important too, but mostly for understanding employment shifts between sectors, which can be as painful as recessions.)
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- our relative merits, michael Sun 10 Sep 2000, 04:21 GMT
- Recession warnings, Michael Perelman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 04:13 GMT
- Re: Recession warnings, Jim Devine Sun 10 Sep 2000, 18:05 GMT
- Re: Re: Recession warnings, Doug Henwood Sun 10 Sep 2000, 18:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Recession warnings, Jim Devine Sun 10 Sep 2000, 19:16 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Recession warnings, Michael Perelman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:08 GMT
- Those questionable productivity numbers, Peter Dorman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:42 GMT
- Re: Those questionable productivity numbers, Doug Henwood Sun 10 Sep 2000, 22:30 GMT
- Re: Those questionable productivity numbers, Max Sawicky Mon 11 Sep 2000, 00:32 GMT