Jim Devine wrote:
Though I agree with the conclusion, the analysis is weak. Faster productivity growth slows employment slowly, over time. When a recession hits, productivity growth slows (or even becomes negative) as businesses hold onto overhead workers in hopes of future profitability.
There are loads of anomalies in the productivity stats. Nondurable manufacturing productivity is flat; it's all concentrated in durables, and within durables, in high-tech production. Service productivity has picked up a bit, but not that profoundly. Looking at the aggregate number is very misleading.
Doug
- Leaflets (Re: Re: Re: Postmodern Grin without a...), Lisa & Ian Murray Sun 10 Sep 2000, 06:41 GMT
- our relative merits, michael Sun 10 Sep 2000, 04:21 GMT
- Recession warnings, Michael Perelman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 04:13 GMT
- Re: Recession warnings, Jim Devine Sun 10 Sep 2000, 18:05 GMT
- Re: Re: Recession warnings, Doug Henwood Sun 10 Sep 2000, 18:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Recession warnings, Jim Devine Sun 10 Sep 2000, 19:16 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Recession warnings, Michael Perelman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:08 GMT
- Those questionable productivity numbers, Peter Dorman Sun 10 Sep 2000, 21:42 GMT
- Re: Those questionable productivity numbers, Doug Henwood Sun 10 Sep 2000, 22:30 GMT