I wonder the extent to which Internet-available music undercuts the record industry's bundling of music - if you want one song you have to buy the WHOLE record: the purchase of one product is tied to the purchase of other products. Consumers are forced to buy stuff they really don't want in order to get what they do want. But the Internet allows people to download single songs or a group of songs less than that which exists on a CD. This undercuts the tieing of lower quality product (music) with higher quality product (good songs). Eric Eric Nilsson Economics California State University, San Bernardino San Bernardino, CA 91711 enilsson@xxxxxxxxx
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
- Re: intellectual property, (continued)
- Re: intellectual property, Michael Perelman Fri 28 Jul 2000, 22:41 GMT
- Re: Re: intellectual property, Nathan Newman Fri 28 Jul 2000, 22:59 GMT
- Re: Re: intellectual property, Jim Devine Fri 28 Jul 2000, 22:59 GMT
- Re: Re: intellectual property, Max Sawicky Fri 28 Jul 2000, 23:05 GMT
- RE: intellectual property, Eric Nilsson Fri 28 Jul 2000, 23:31 GMT
- Re: RE: intellectual property, michael Fri 28 Jul 2000, 23:44 GMT
- What's left in South Africa?, Ken Hanly Fri 28 Jul 2000, 20:08 GMT
- Asia as world's cesspit, Stephen E Philion Fri 28 Jul 2000, 19:43 GMT
- Environmentalists Against Gore (fwd), Michael Hoover Fri 28 Jul 2000, 18:14 GMT