I tried to read this until I got to the sentence asserting that "Predation, redistribution, and socialism are synonymous terms." This represents a classical Lockean view: property is _our_ (i.e., the capitalists') by the law of Nature and/or God, so that any redistribution (as under modern liberalism) or redefinition of property rights (as under socialism) is predation, i.e., theft. Beyond that it seemed very muddled.
Before I briefly sign off, I thought you might want to check out the latest piece of sophistry from the IMF/Sachs apologists as regards current events in Russia. You can find it at
http://www.russiaeconomy.org/
In some paleoconservative quarters there is considerable disquiet over what has been termed the "market bolshevism" of the Larry Summers brigade (e.g. recent issues of the National Interest). But fear not -- economic meltdown has nothing to do with shock therapy. Apparently the problem presently afflicting the unfortunate citizens of that country is a mutation known as "Enterprise Network Socialism."
Glad we got that sorted.
Michael K.
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Invisible foot, (continued)
- Re: Invisible foot, Jim Devine Thu 27 Jul 2000, 15:54 GMT
- Re: Re: Invisible foot, Michael Hoover Fri 28 Jul 2000, 19:04 GMT
- The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Michael Keaney Thu 27 Jul 2000, 09:52 GMT
- Re: The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Michael Perelman Thu 27 Jul 2000, 16:14 GMT
- Re: The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Jim Devine Thu 27 Jul 2000, 22:40 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Timework Web Thu 27 Jul 2000, 15:25 GMT
- Re: Re: The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Jim Devine Thu 27 Jul 2000, 15:38 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: The Vacuity of the Hoover Institute, Michael Perelman Thu 27 Jul 2000, 16:14 GMT
- The Internet Anti-Fascist: Tuesday, 21 July 2000 -- 4:59 (#444), Paul Kneisel Thu 27 Jul 2000, 00:04 GMT