Louis Proyect wrote:
Of course it is more productive. But that is not the point that Marx was making.
Marx wrote:
Large-scale industry and industrially pursued large-scale agriculture have the same effect. If they are originally distinguished by the fact that the former lays waste and ruins labour-power and thus the natural power of man, whereas the latter does the same to the natural power of the soil, they link up in the later course of development, since the industrial system applied to agriculture also enervates the workers there, while industry and trade for their part provide agriculture with the means of exhausting the soil.
- Enough, (continued)
- Enough, Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:50 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of], Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:17 GMT
- Faith & Economics (was Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System...), Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 30 Jun 2000, 19:55 GMT
- Productivity, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:07 GMT
- Re: Productivity, Doug Henwood Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:27 GMT
- Re: Re: Productivity, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:38 GMT
- Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of], Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:15 GMT
- Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Ken Hanly Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:25 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jun 2000, 00:07 GMT