PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: re: Tautology



Yes, of course, Charles.

Rod

Charles Brown wrote:

> >>> rodhay@xxxxxxxxxx 06/30/00 01:25PM >>>
> After thinking better of my sarcastic tone to Carrol's message. Let me
> explain.
>
> A tautology is a statement that is true by definition. That is, it is
> always true.
>
> A = A is a tautology.
>
> A = B is not a tautology. That is, it might be false.
>
> Similarly all true statements are not tautologies. I.e., A = B might be
> true.
>
> __________
>
> CB: Sorry, couldn't help saying this since we are in a logical vein. You mean "not all true statements are tautologies" , I believe.
>
> I agree with your post, though.
>
> _________
>
> If all statements were tautologies, math and logic would be very easy.
> Anything you write down would be true. No need to prove anything.
>
> --

--
Rod Hay
rodhay@xxxxxxxxxx
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]