PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: re: Tautology
Yes, of course, Charles.
Rod
Charles Brown wrote:
> >>> rodhay@xxxxxxxxxx 06/30/00 01:25PM >>>
> After thinking better of my sarcastic tone to Carrol's message. Let me
> explain.
>
> A tautology is a statement that is true by definition. That is, it is
> always true.
>
> A = A is a tautology.
>
> A = B is not a tautology. That is, it might be false.
>
> Similarly all true statements are not tautologies. I.e., A = B might be
> true.
>
> __________
>
> CB: Sorry, couldn't help saying this since we are in a logical vein. You mean "not all true statements are tautologies" , I believe.
>
> I agree with your post, though.
>
> _________
>
> If all statements were tautologies, math and logic would be very easy.
> Anything you write down would be true. No need to prove anything.
>
> --
--
Rod Hay
rodhay@xxxxxxxxxx
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada
- Thread context:
- U.S. Military against People & Nature,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 30 Jun 2000, 17:29 GMT
- re: Tautology,
Rod Hay Fri 30 Jun 2000, 17:27 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- re: Tautology,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Jun 2000, 19:02 GMT
- Fwd: Open invitation to join "Rad-Green",
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 30 Jun 2000, 16:42 GMT
- dumb question,
Ellen Frank Fri 30 Jun 2000, 15:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]