PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
re: Tautology
After thinking better of my sarcastic tone to Carrol's message. Let me
explain.
A tautology is a statement that is true by definition. That is, it is
always true.
A = A is a tautology.
A = B is not a tautology. That is, it might be false.
Similarly all true statements are not tautologies. I.e., A = B might be
true.
If all statements were tautologies, math and logic would be very easy.
Anything you write down would be true. No need to prove anything.
--
Rod Hay
rodhay@xxxxxxxxxx
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada
- Thread context:
- re: whatever,
Mark Jones Fri 30 Jun 2000, 18:51 GMT
- Re x 10: query,
enilsson Fri 30 Jun 2000, 18:26 GMT
- U.S. Military against People & Nature,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 30 Jun 2000, 17:29 GMT
- re: Tautology,
Rod Hay Fri 30 Jun 2000, 17:27 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- re: Tautology,
Charles Brown Fri 30 Jun 2000, 19:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]