Louis Proyect wrote:
Doug:Does the revo also mean there won't be modern transportation, chemical fertilizers, mechnized plowing and reaping, etc.? Then there's truly no way to sustain a world population of more than, say, a billion people, maybe fewer - meaning that at least 80% of us have to go.
You don't seem to be aware that smaller farms are more productive than large agribusiness type concerns.
Where did I endorse large agribusiness? If small farms are more productive, then let's have more of them; I'm all for separating the imperatives of capital from those of real social efficiency and humaneness. But even small farms use modern transportation and machines.
Doug
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Jim Devine Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:43 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:50 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:56 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jun 2000, 00:12 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Doug Henwood Fri 30 Jun 2000, 16:39 GMT
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Mark Jones Fri 30 Jun 2000, 16:53 GMT
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], Ken Hanly Fri 30 Jun 2000, 20:50 GMT
- Farming productivity, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:28 GMT
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of], phillp2 Sat 01 Jul 2000, 01:30 GMT