BLS DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2000: RELEASED TODAY: "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation - March 2000" indicates that in March 2000, employer costs for employee compensation for civilian workers (private industry and State and local government) in the United States average $21.16 per hour worked.. Wages and salaries, which averaged $15.36, accounted for approximately 73 percent of these costs, while benefits, which averaged $5.80, accounted for the remaining 27 percent. Services industries -- from personal services to health and business services -- created more than half of all new jobs produced by U.S. private businesses, excluding agriculture, during the period from 1992 through 1997, according to figures scheduled for release today by the Census Bureau. Census said that services industries created a total of 6.4 million new jobs during that 5-year period, with total employment in the sector rising to 34 million. The increase in total services jobs represented a 24.4 percent gain over the period. Figures are available by industry and by state for the period, based on the agency's 1997 "Economic Census". Every 5 years, Census conducts a broad survey of U.S. industries to determine not only employment levels, but also receipts and other information. Census said that most of the growth in services jobs during that period was among establishment subject to federal income tax, while tax-exempt service establishments (including hospitals) grew at a slower rate. For the first time since completion of the North American Industrial Classification System, Census made the "Economic Census" data available both on the North American Industrial Classification System basis, and on the old Standard Industrial Classification basis. A Census analyst says NAICS provides some new industry categories (including casinos), as it updates the classification system to reflect changes in the economy (Daily Labor Report, page A-11; The Washington Post, page E17).. The long economic boom has pushed unemployment to its lowest level in decades, but more jobs don't necessarily mean higher living standards. A new report shows that an American holding a full-time job in the late 1990s was still as likely to fall below the official poverty line as a similar worker in the 1980s, and more likely to do so than a full-time worker in the 1970s. "Working full-time and year-round is for more and more Americans, not enough," the Conference Board asserts in a study entitled "Does a Rising Tide Lift All Boats?" "This is not the outcome one would expect from the longest economic expansion in economic history," adds the report to be released today by the New York-based nonprofit business research center. Some economists said the Conference Board report was flawed because, in using official government definition of poverty, it ignores the impact of the earned income tax credit for low-income workers, a program that was significantly expanded in the 1990s. But others said the study still highlights an important point often lost amid the celebratory hype about the current boom: Lower-skilled workers have profited much less than others, and have yet to recover from the sharp erosion of earnings from the mid-1970s through the mid-1990s. Conference Board researchers, using unpublished Census data, found that the poverty rate for full-time workers stayed almost constant over the past 20 years, with rates hovering between 2.4 and 3.1 percent in the 1980s. That conclusion tempers other data suggesting that lower-income families fared better in the 1990s than in the 1980s (The Wall Street Journal, page A12). Data compiled by the Bureau of National Affairs in the first 26 weeks of 2000 for all settlements show a weighted average first-year increase of 3.9 percent in newly negotiated contracts, compared with 2.7 percent in the same period in 1999. Manufacturing contracts provided a weighted average increase of 3.4 percent, compared with 3.1 percent in 1999. Excluding construction contracts, the nonmanufacturing industry weighted average increase was 4.1 percent, compared with 2.5 percent a year earlier (Daily Labor Report, page D-1). Federal Reserve policymakers chose yesterday to leave their target for overnight interest rates unchanged while waiting for more evidence about how much U.S. economic growth is slowing, but they cautioned that more rate increases may lie ahead (John M. Berry in The Washington Post, page E1; The New York Times, page C1). __The Federal Reserve paused in its yearlong campaign to raise interest rates, but issued a blunt warning that it could resume efforts to slow the economy if growth rebounds this summer (The Wall Street Journal, page A2). E-mail is reducing the need for mail carriers, fax machines and even telephones in offices world-wide, according to a new survey that shows how e-mail is transforming the workplace. Among the more than 1,000 employees polled in May, 80 percent said e-mail has replaced "snail mail" for the majority of their business correspondence, 72.5 percent said it has replaced faxing and 45 percent said it has replaced phone calls. The study, called "E-mail Behavior in the Workplace," was conducted by Vault.com. a Web site for career and human resources information. The survey detailed e-mail practices and attitudes by asking questions about monitoring worries, requesting a raise and communicating with one's boss. Among those surveyed, 42 percent said they worried about employers monitoring their e-mail and 79 percent said they used a separate account such as Hotmail or Yahoo for personal correspondence (The Washington Post, page E7). The value of new construction contracts eased 3 percent in May, as higher interest rates depressed demand for residential and nonresidential building (The Wall Street Journal, page B2).
<<application/ms-tnef>>
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: query, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: query, Brad De Long Fri 30 Jun 2000, 18:39 GMT
- Re: query, Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 21:21 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: query, enilsson Fri 30 Jun 2000, 20:38 GMT
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Thu 29 Jun 2000, 18:25 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- BLS Daily Report, Richardson_D Fri 30 Jun 2000, 14:56 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System andNationalEmissions of] (fwd), Charles Brown Thu 29 Jun 2000, 17:59 GMT
- Re: Asperger's Syndrome, Brad De Long Thu 29 Jun 2000, 17:52 GMT
- Krugman Watch: Japan (again), Jim Devine Thu 29 Jun 2000, 17:35 GMT
- Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and NationalEmissions of] (fwd), Charles Brown Thu 29 Jun 2000, 17:15 GMT