xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
okey! go and explain these to your audience in your radio show! Doug and over-population tonight under Wall Street lights...
I'm completely anti-Malthusian. I never talk about overpopulation except to criticize Malthusians. I like big cities, too, where people are numerous and densely packed. I don't know how this fits into your ideological taxonomy, but since you already have me pegged as a "liberal," the choice is down to a modifying adjective or two.
Doug
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:49 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Louis Proyect Thu 29 Jun 2000, 22:40 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), M A Jones Fri 30 Jun 2000, 01:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), xxxxxx Thu 29 Jun 2000, 21:07 GMT
- pop, Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:02 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:42 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Ken Hanly Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 22:02 GMT
- Re: re: energy (fwd), xxxxxx Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:41 GMT