Michael Perelman wrote:
I just read that NY City is the largest consumer of pesticides in the state. Now that you have that part of the agricultural system, may the rest won't be too hard.
Could you be a little less opaque? Do you mean that reducing pesticide use will require depopulating the cities? Where will everyone go?
NYC also houses half the U.S. non-poverty households without cars. We use less energy here than practically any place in the USA. If you depopulate us, will we have to start driving? Or do I have to grow my own food and weave my own cloth?
Doug
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Louis Proyect Thu 29 Jun 2000, 22:40 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), M A Jones Fri 30 Jun 2000, 01:06 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), xxxxxx Thu 29 Jun 2000, 21:07 GMT
- pop, Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:02 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:42 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Ken Hanly Thu 29 Jun 2000, 23:01 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in theWorld-System and National Emissions of] (fwd), Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jun 2000, 22:02 GMT
- Re: re: energy (fwd), xxxxxx Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:41 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Position in the World-System and NationalEmissions of] (fwd), Doug Henwood Thu 29 Jun 2000, 16:41 GMT