bounced from jim devine

To: pen-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: bounced from jim devine
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:30:14 -0700

this bounced because Jim used a bad word in his subject line (v*cation)

Today's Paul Krugman column in the NY TIMES (at
http://www.nytimes.com/library/opinion/krugman/042600krug.html) is on
the
proposal to break up Microsoft into two near-monopolies. Anti-trust is
not
my field and I'm excessively busy, so I'll let others comment on it.
Besides it's pretty non-committal, lacking the usual degree of Krugman
arrogance.

Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx &  http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine


--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901

Prev by Date: youth crime enforcement bias
Next by Date: Re: Keynes the radical
Previous by thread: youth crime enforcement bias
Next by thread: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd), (continued)
  - Re: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd), xxxxxx Fri 28 Apr 2000, 08:13 GMT
    - Re: Re: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd), Brad De Long Fri 28 Apr 2000, 15:41 GMT
      
      Re: Re: Re: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd), Doug Henwood Fri 28 Apr 2000, 17:29 GMT
  - Re: Re: youth crime enforcement bias (fwd), xxxxxx Fri 28 Apr 2000, 16:57 GMT
- bounced from jim devine, Michael Perelman Wed 26 Apr 2000, 15:33 GMT
- youth crime enforcement bias, Jim Devine Wed 26 Apr 2000, 15:27 GMT
- [Fwd: New British Empire of the Dammed], Eugene Coyle Wed 26 Apr 2000, 14:46 GMT
  - Re: [Fwd: New British Empire of the Dammed], Chris Burford Thu 27 Apr 2000, 20:38 GMT
- query on cashews, Jim Devine Wed 26 Apr 2000, 04:06 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]