I don't know, West Africa was "more advanced" than Europe during the European Middle Ages, the 500 years before 1500. The ecology didn't change in the interim.
I tend to think of Europe's leap forward over the rest of the world (not just Africa) in the last 500 years, as an expression of a sort of law of evolutionary potential ( "the last shall be first"). The idea is that the area that is most backward in one period has the most potential to leap forward in the next period because when you at the bottom of the heap you are more open to change, whereas when you are on top you cling to the status quo.
CB
Interesting idea....
Ken Pomeranz's _The Great Divergence_ develops it to some degree--that the very *success* of India and China at mobilizing resources gave them large populations, and that Europe's earlier lack of success at mobilizing resources gave at an extra edge of free resources that helped propel it forward in the early modern period...
Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel, (continued)
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel, Jim Devine Tue 11 Apr 2000, 18:45 GMT
- Re: guns, germs, steel, Jim Devine Tue 11 Apr 2000, 18:35 GMT
- guns, germs, steel, Charles Brown Mon 10 Apr 2000, 17:00 GMT
- guns, germs, steel, Charles Brown Mon 10 Apr 2000, 17:53 GMT
- Re: guns, germs, steel, Brad De Long Mon 10 Apr 2000, 18:29 GMT
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel, Jim Devine Mon 10 Apr 2000, 21:06 GMT
- Re: guns, germs, steel, Ricardo Duchesne Mon 10 Apr 2000, 18:43 GMT
- Re: Re: guns, germs, steel, Louis Proyect Mon 10 Apr 2000, 19:10 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: guns, germs, steel, Rod Hay Mon 10 Apr 2000, 20:32 GMT