PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
thinning ozone
On the way to work, I heard a report on U.S. National Public Radio that
indicated that experts were shocked because the Arctic ozone layer was
thinner than expected: the expected recovery of that layer had been slowed,
where the recovery was expected because ozone-depleting chloroflourocarbons
(CFCs) had stopped being used.
I don't believe this. I thought that CFCs were still in use in many places
and that the replacement for them (HCFCs) also had negative effects on the
ozone layer. (There are still a lot of leaky old refrigerators and
air-conditioning units that have CFCs in them, right?) Also, is there any
evidence that the ozone layer is "recovering"?
inquiring minds want to know...
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: chronology of financial crisis from 19th through 20th, (continued)
- reality check,
Michael Perelman Thu 06 Apr 2000, 17:20 GMT
- [Fwd: RadFest 2000] (fwd),
xxxxxx Thu 06 Apr 2000, 16:38 GMT
- thinning ozone,
Jim Devine Thu 06 Apr 2000, 16:18 GMT
- Run on the Bank,
Patrick Bond Thu 06 Apr 2000, 16:09 GMT
- Brad DeLong's column,
Jim Devine Thu 06 Apr 2000, 16:08 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]