Essentially, this is the same kind of argument being made by defenders of capitalism in this discussion. They say that things are getting better in the third world. Look at life expectancy figures. They are better than they were 100 years ago. Isn't that progress? Why disrupt this march forward with ill-advised attempts to alter the economic system, which might lead to Pol Pot or Stalin.
Who exactly has made this argument? Not even Brad De Long, really.
Excuse me...
Let me point out that out there I am known as a fuzzy-headed left-wing utopian, a believer in world peace through world law, who has a touching but naive faith in the effectiveness of governments and the possibilities for collective action.
That is, that's what I'm seen as by the people who don't think I'm a socialist who wants to confiscate all their hard-earned wealth and give it to the undeserving poor in order to increase my personal power as a potential bureaucrat...
Brad DeLong
- non-capitalist development, (continued)
- non-capitalist development, Louis Proyect Sun 13 Feb 2000, 01:34 GMT
- Re: non-capitalist development, Doug Henwood Sun 13 Feb 2000, 15:47 GMT
- non-capitalist development, Louis Proyect Sun 13 Feb 2000, 16:10 GMT
- Re: non-capitalist development, Michael Perelman Sun 13 Feb 2000, 17:06 GMT
- Re: Re: non-capitalist development, Brad De Long Mon 14 Feb 2000, 04:50 GMT
- Re: Re: Reparations and capitalist progress., Michael Perelman Sun 13 Feb 2000, 01:18 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Reparations and capitalist progress., Brad De Long Sun 13 Feb 2000, 02:53 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Reparations and capitalist progress., Michael Perelman Sun 13 Feb 2000, 03:36 GMT
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reparations and capitalist progress., Brad De Long Sun 13 Feb 2000, 15:58 GMT